Iowa Supreme Court Addresses Work Comp Insurer, Third-Party Administrator Liability for Civil Damages
- Jun 05, 2019
Legal Update by Attorney Alison Stewart
Two recent Iowa Supreme Court decisions have addressed liability of workers’ compensation carriers and third-party administrators. In both cases, the Court
declined to extend liability.
Clark, et al v. Ins. Co. of the State of Penn., File No. 17-2068 (Iowa, May 3, 2019)
Recently, the Iowa Supreme Court addressed whether Iowa Code section 517.5, which mandates that no inspection of any place of employment made by insurance
inspectors shall be the basis for imposition of civil liability upon the inspector or insurance carrier, is constitutional. In Clark, the
plaintiffs alleged employees of the insured were exposed to hazardous chemicals while manufacturing wind blades and that the workers’ compensation
carrier’s failure to inspect the employer was the cause of plaintiffs’ injuries. These claims were brought in district court. The Iowa Supreme Court
disagreed and outlined a detailed history of the policy behind the exclusive remedy doctrine which requires injury claims brought by employees against
their employer must be brought before the workers’ compensation commissioner. This means that immunity remains for carriers who either fail to inspect
or negligently inspect the premises of an insured.
De Bois v. Broadspire, File No. 18-1227 (Iowa, May 10, 2019)
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled an injured worker cannot sue a workers’ compensation third party administrator for civil bad faith. In Iowa, an injured worker can establish damages beyond those entitlements provided pursuant to the workers’ compensation chapter where benefits are denied without a reasonable basis and that the carrier knew or should have known its refusal or delay was without such a basis. The Court reasoned that the duties imposed upon a workers’ compensation insurer are non-delegable, and thus, the acts of a third-party administrator, are the acts of the insurer. The liability of third party administrators remains limited to the contractual obligation they have to their insurers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required by rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa.
Peddicord Wharton Legislative Updates are intended to provide information on current developments in legislation impacting our clients. Readers should not rely solely upon this information as legal advice. Peddicord Wharton attorneys would be pleased to answer any questions you may have about this update. ©2019 Peddicord Wharton. All Rights Reserved.